Comments on: No Love from LexisNexis https://www.statedecoded.com/2013/01/lexisnexis-love/ Legal codes, for humans. Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:52:11 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.2.5 By: Waldo Jaquith https://www.statedecoded.com/2013/01/lexisnexis-love/#comment-1463 Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:52:11 +0000 http://www.statedecoded.com/?p=190#comment-1463 I suppose that’s possible, Cushing. I think they sell an awfully large number of volumes each year, but perhaps they function primarily as office decorations at this point? That said, making the TOCs look better would be a pretty trivial task. That’s something a temp could knock out in an afternoon. (My wife used to temp for Lexis, many years ago. At least then they relied pretty heavily on temp labor for this sort thing.)

On Twitter, Erin Monaghan suggests that this simply a holdover from the days when the Michie Company printed the Code of Virginia. (Disclaimer: My father-in-law worked for Michie.) They may have done it in this manner, for lack of any competition or demand for improvement, and now Lexis would rather leave it as-is than face complaints from attorneys that a thing is different than it was and, therefore, bad. As both an origin story and as reason for not improving it, this is better than anything I can manage to think of.

]]>
By: Cushing Whitney https://www.statedecoded.com/2013/01/lexisnexis-love/#comment-1461 Thu, 03 Jan 2013 16:44:17 +0000 http://www.statedecoded.com/?p=190#comment-1461 I wonder if this is because they make the bulk of their money from collating and providing access to the data at a low-level. Spending resources to make the data more cognitively accessible might not provide them with reasonable returns on the investment.

]]>